tabacco

Calendar

««Nov 2009»»
SMTWTFS
1
23
4
5
6
7
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930

My Bookmarks

My Top Tags

                                       

Mailing List

My RSS Feeds








AL QAEDA GETS IT! Bush Needs Them In Iraq 4 USA Occupation. Terrorists Leave Iraq, Go Where Oil Isn't; Fight On Turf Bush Doesn't Want! Obama Will Have To Pay For Bush's Overplayed Hand - OpEd

« H E Tabacco :: email
posted Wednesday, 3 December 2008

 

AL QAEDA GETS IT!

 

Bush Needs Them

 

In Iraq To Give

 

USA Occupation

 

Excuse. Terrorists

 

Leave & Go Where

 

Oil Isn’t; Fight On

 

Turf Bush Doesn’t

 

Want! But Obama

 

Will Have To Pay

 

For Bush’s

 

Overplayed Hand

 

– Op-Ed

 

 

 

 

PSYCHOLOGY 101

 

Al Qaeda's Response: Prime Example of 

what happens when you act first and

think second!

 

Tabacco: Let’s Recap the Iraq War circa 2001, using the tried and true Investigative Reporter Check List:

1- Who
2- What
3- When
4- Where
5- Why
6- How

1- Who: the Bush administration


2- What: invade and occupy oil-rich Iraq


3- When: ASAP


4- Where: Iraq


5- Why: A) Saddam Hussein made oil deals with the Russians, French & Germans, excluding US oil companies. To revoke those deals and get the oil for Exxon etc., the United States must invade Iraq, capture & execute Saddam Hussein, control the oil and the Regime Change Iraqi government, set up deals between that Puppet government and American oil conglomerates.


B) To achieve greater income for Military- Industrial Complex, a War in Iraq will allow us, the Bush administration, to buy exorbitant amounts of military munitions, vehicles, military food and other supplies with Public Funds, which would not be necessary in Peace Time.                                                           

C- As further justification, we will invoke “bringing democracy to Totalitarian Iraq” as a further Excuse for our Invasion and Occupation.


6- How: A – (1) Accuse Saddam of pursuing WMDs, (2) being complicit in 9/11/01, (3) committing Genocide in Iraq and (4) being a War Criminal; ... (1) ancient history; (2) absolute lie; (3) & (4) have been known by US administrations for decades since the US put him in power - it never bothered us before, but now we needed their oil. 

B – Repeating “9/11” ad nauseam to frighten the American people and scare them into reelecting GWB, supporting the Patriot Act & other Initiatives, which remove Civil Rights for Americans as well as any Rights for those we name as Terrorists;                                   

C- Invade Iraq, secure the oil fields, set Sunni against Shia, set up Puppet Government, use Private Contractors (Paid Killers) such as Halliburton & Blackwater to complement our own forces.                                             

D- Accuse any and all Detractors, Opponents & Adversaries stateside of being Traitors and un-American.                                                   

E- Draw Foreign Terrorists into Iraq by challenging Islamic manhood, including Extraordinary Rendition, Torture of Detainees & allowing those “Practices” to become Public Knowledge.                                                    

F- Ultimately expand the War(s) to other OPEC countries in the Region, which do not already bend to our needs.

Lest you think the above “Shopping List” is too harsh and unsupportable, may I remind you that this “Shopping List” is NOT what Tabacco imagines the Bushites actually planned in his “conspiracy-laden mind”, this “Shopping List” is in effect nothing more than an Historical Recap of Events concerning Iraq since 2001.

Some of you undoubtedly will believe the Bush Regime merely responded to Events as they occurred. To those Wishful Thinkers I say that Good Fortune is generally the Result of Good Planning rather than Blind Luck! When it comes to the Imperialism of Powerful Nations, Luck is the least of any Imperialist’s assets.

The unbelievable and amusing aspect of this whole Affair is that it took al Qaeda and the other Terrorists 5 years to figure it out: that Bush wanted them in Iraq, needed them in Iraq to justify Never-ending Occupation.

Just as Adolf Hitler overplayed his hand by invading Russia prematurely and receiving a resounding defeat, George W. and Karl Rove overplayed their hand (that’s “hand” singular) by paying off Sunnis and Shias to stop killing Americans and each other, initiating the “Surge”, whose sole purpose was to SILENCE OPPONENTS and merely reduce the numbers of American Casualties, not eliminate them entirely.

Did the new Bush Tactics work? ONLY TOO WELL! Bush-Rove had overplayed their hand!

Once it became too hot in Iraq for Foreign Terrorists, they realized they needed another “Plan”. It may also have finally occurred to them that Bush wanted and needed them in Iraq.

They (Terrorists) decided to focus instead on Afghanistan, without the Oil Incentive for Bush. Bush doesn’t want to fight in Afghanistan – there’s NO PROFIT IN IT!

“Necessity is the mother of invention!”

So whether it was the Terrorist Think Tank or plain NECESSITY, they finally took action, which makes US Occupation of Iraq untenable. A stroke of genius! Well, maybe only an “invention of necessity”, but it worked.

Forcing American troops out of Iraq and into Afghanistan is a strategy, which can appeal to neither George W. nor Barack Obama. There’s no Profit in it, except for the Military-Industrial Complex, which couldn’t care less where the “War” is, so long as there is a WAR!

But Exxon will NOT be ecstatic that Iraqi oil will again become “VULNERABLE” re their own SELFISH INTERESTS!

And the best part of this whole Strategy is that nobody will ever think we, the Bush Administration, actually desired/required the presence of Foreign Terrorists to justify our continued Occupation. And if anyone does think of it, they will NOT DARE SAY IT! Well maybe that infernal Blogger, Tabacco! But after all, who reads him!

 

Carrot and/or Stick

There are two ways to influence people to go West:

1 – Push them Eastwardly in an unfriendly manner, and

2 – Entice or Provoke them from a Westward locale, which necessitates that if they wish to retaliate against you, they must go where? WEST!



Tabacco: I consider myself both a funnel and a filter. I funnel information, not readily available on the Mass Media, which is ignored and/or suppressed. I filter out the irrelevancies and trivialities to save both the time and effort of my Readers and bring consternation to the enemies of Truth & Fairness! When you read Tabacco, if you don’t learn something NEW, I’ve wasted your time.


In 1981's 'Body Heat', Kathleen Turner said, "Knowledge is power".

 logo

T.A.B.A.C.C.O.  (Truth About Business And Congressional Crimes Organization) – Think Tank For Other 95% Of World

tags:                                                


comments (3)


1. Tabacco left...
Wednesday, 3 December 2008 1:04 pm :: http://tabacco.blog-city.com/

Remember the 2nd Sugar Ray Leonard-Roberto Duran fight (No mas!)?

In the 1st fight, Duran challenged Leonard's machismo to "stand up and fight like a man, toe-to-toe" - Leonard lost.

In the 2nd fight, Leonard fought peek-aboo, hit & run. After about 7 rounds of being unable to lay a glove on Leonard, Duran uttered that famous surrender "No mas!"

If Terrorists had studied History as we do, they might have hit upon this Strategy 5 years ago. "Those, who do not study history, are doomed to relive it" (or words to that effect).

Tabacco


2. your a chump left...
Saturday, 6 December 2008 9:08 am

You have to be the only blogger I've ever seen that leaves random comments on your own posts. It's quite amateur and it looks bad. Unless of course you have some sort of strange alter ego or a second personality and you aren't aware of what you've posted. This site stinks.


3. Tabacco left...
Saturday, 6 December 2008 1:48 pm :: http://tabacco.blog-city.com/

Your a chump:

Thanks for your opinion! And thanks for your unintended backhand comment: that Tabacco is unique! I'm euphoric that someone, particularly a detractor, finally noticed.

"It's quite amateur and it looks bad. Unless of course you have some sort of strange alter ego or a second personality and you aren't aware of what you've posted." - By implication, folks, he's calling me "multiple personality" on the sly. Again, I thank you! Most people only have one personality; since you think I have at least 2, I guess I'm ahead in the game.

Appearing "amateurish" or looking "bad" has never been my primary concern. What disappointed me about you, obviously an avid Reader of Tabacco, is that you did not include all the possibilities. Instead, you act like a typical Republican and cherrypick your own preference. That's why I blog: to teach Readers how to look at all possibilities, then discard the untenable and whatever is left must be the Truth. This comes to us courtesy of Arthur Conan Doyle's 'Sherlock Holmes". I recommend the Doyle anthology to you very highly. And I apologize for failing to teach "Deductive Reasoning" to you and make it stick. Your failure is my failure. I again apologize.

Let's explore those "Options" you missed:

1- New ideas, facts and events, which occurred after my Publication.

2- To give certain facts or ideas particular focus, which might be lost in the voluminous rhetoric, which usually comprises one of my bombastic Posts.

3- Unpublished Comments, which contribute nothing in themselves - similar to your own Comment- but which made me think and respond to an objection, which some might have.

4- Just to provoke, elicit objections and permit further exposition of my own, based on those objections.

5- Formerly, Comments appeared on the Home Page and were viewable by all Guests, whether they clicked on a particular Post or not. This practice was changed by Blog-City, but Tabacco became so enamored of the practice of Commenting on my own Blog, I did not change.

And most importantly, 6- When Tabacco makes an error of commission or an error of omission, I consider it disingenuous to correct that oversight a day or a week later as if I never made the mistake in the first place - as I'm sure the bloggers, of whom you speak, do on a regular basis. Grammatical mistakes, verbiage that leaves too much for the Reader to assume, which I missed initially because I did not reread my own Post after publishing, I normally correct without fanfare. I do not consider my every 'hiccup' to be newsworthy.

Now, allow me to present my own theory about you, "Your a chump": I think you are less concerned with my techniques than you are with my content. As you are unable or reticent about challenging my ideas and facts, you challenge my unique qualities. That reminds me of the old bromide for lawyers:

"When the opposition has the Facts on their side, pound the Law. When the opposition has the Law on their side, pound the Facts. If the opposition has both the Law and the Facts on their side, POUND THE TABLE!"

It appears to this Blogger that you sir, Mr. Your a chump, are doing a lot of "Table Pounding". Since your grammar is pitiful "You're a chump" NOT "Your a chump", for you to correct my blogging style is both presumptuous and ridiculous. My blogging style may require critiquing, BUT NOT BY AN ILLITERATE such as you.

I know who you are. You have Commented here frequently using different names, but always the same style. Style is not something, which one can change easily. Most of your Comments have been 86ed by me. A few I deemed worthwhile because of their inanity.

You see, despite what you may think, I prefer Comments, which disagree, to those, which concur. What could be more boring than positive reinforcement! The problem is that most of those, who disagree, have no substantive case to present. So they "Pound the Table".

Tabacco PS My Comments to my own Posts are rarely "random". I also recommend you get a Webster's Unabridged Dictionary and look up words prior to using them, including the difference between "your" and "you're"! "random" is hardly a word that a truly illiterate person would have in his or her arsenal! Sorry, chum, but you cannot obfuscate your own educational background!

"It's quite amateurish", not "It's quite amateur". You require lots of Remedial Tutoring - I know you are attempting to diminish your own education, but you make errors in that deception. Sometimes you overdo the misspellings; sometimes you use words, not commonly used by true illiterates. I hope these tips have been helpful to you in your next Scam here. I am also convinced you work for the RNC or some facsimile thereof.

The perplexity is this: Educated people generally are incapable of successfully pretending to be otherwise, whereas Illiterates cannot be entrusted with your job of harassing Tabacco. it does require some IQ points. See the problem!