tabacco

Calendar

««Nov 2009»»
SMTWTFS
1
23
4
5
6
7
8
910
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
192021
22
232425262728
2930

My Bookmarks

My Top Tags

Mailing List

My RSS Feeds








M&A: MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS! 1- Google, 2- Yahoo & 3- Microsoft: No 3 Offers To Acquire No 2: Stock Has 60% 1-Day Jump! Good Or Bad? Good For Investors & Bad For You! - RI10

posted Saturday, 2 February 2008

M&A: MERGERS AND

 

ACQUISITIONS!

 

1- Google, 2- Yahoo

 

& 3- Microsoft:

 

No 3 Offers To

 

Acquire No 2: Stock

 

Has 60% 1-Day

 

Jump! Good Or Bad?

 

Good For Investors

 

& Bad For You!

 

- RI10

 

 

 

 

http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/front/la-fi-microsoft2feb02,1,2161917.story?ctrack=1&cset=true 

 graph

Q. What’s wrong with this graph?
A. Microsoft, in the Red, is buying
out Yahoo, in the Black. That’s
what’s wrong! Capitalism may make
sense, but it isn’t ethical, logical or
equitable!


   
graph

 

   logo

Microsoft's Yahoo bid aims at Web

It makes an unsolicited $44.6-billion offer for the struggling titan in a battle with Google for online supremacy.

By Joseph Menn and Jessica Guynn,
Los Angeles Times Staff Writers
February 2, 2008


Acknowledging it can't beat Internet juggernaut Google Inc. on its own, Microsoft Corp. on Friday lashed its online fortunes to another Web also-ran with an unsolicited $44.6-billion bid for Yahoo Inc.

Microsoft and Yahoo, two of the world's most powerful technology companies, have each spent billions of dollars over the last half-decade trying to catch up to Google in the lucrative search-engine advertising business but still find themselves as far behind as ever.

When Yahoo's stock plunged to a four-year low this week, Microsoft pounced. It had been rebuffed by Yahoo before, but Friday's $31-a-share offer amounted to 62% more than the company's market value, and this time Microsoft publicly announced its intentions. Yahoo said it would consider the offer.

If Yahoo shareholders say, “yes”, and the deal survives the heavy scrutiny expected from U.S. and European regulators, it would represent the largest merger of two technology companies to date. The pact would combine the world's top software maker with an Internet titan struggling to find its way.

A merger would probably yield few major changes for Web users, analysts said, but could keep Google's growing sway over the $40-billion online advertising market in check by creating a powerful alternative for marketers.

"With the combined reach of these two properties, you've got a really tantalizing prospect for the online advertising community", said Ian Schafer, chief executive of online marketing agency Deep Focus.

Google would continue to dominate Web search, where Nielsen Online said it had 56% of the market. But Microsoft and Yahoo would control the majority of online banners and other display ads, plus compete well with Google in the developing markets for video and mobile ads, analysts said.

"The combined entity would be visited by 86% of U.S. Internet users, account for 15% of all time spent online, and represent 59% of online display ad impressions", Nielsen Vice President Ken Cassar said.

Integrating the two companies, however, could be a huge challenge.

Microsoft, based in Redmond, Wash., makes the operating systems that run more than 90% of the planet's personal computers. It's awash in cash but loses money in its online ventures as it invests heavily in its search engine and ad-delivery technologies.

Yahoo's websites were the world's third-most-visited in December, behind Google and Microsoft's, according to Nielsen. The Sunnyvale, Calif., company has continued to surrender online advertising market share to Google, which earned more than six times as much money in 2007 thanks to the text ads it delivers with search-engine results.

After resurrecting the company after the dot-com crash early this decade, Terry Semel stepped down as Yahoo's chief executive in June under pressure from shareholders. Co-founder Jerry Yang replaced him but so far has made little visible progress competitively. Semel resigned as chairman on Thursday.

Microsoft had proposed joining forces in a number of ways during the last few years, only to be turned down by Yang and other top executives. This week, after Microsoft reported strong quarterly earnings and Yahoo gave a weak forecast, the software giant's chief executive, Steve Ballmer, acted.

Ballmer called Yang and said he was ready to go public with a generous offer that could force the hand of Yahoo's board of directors. With Yang still noncommittal, Microsoft made good on the threat Friday.

"Only in the last couple of weeks has it gotten patently evident that it's the right thing to do", said a veteran of both companies who requested anonymity because he still worked with them. "The perception is it's such an extraordinary alignment of opportunity that it would be egregious not to make this play. It's the best possible counter to Google's continued growth".

Analysts said the large premium made it likely that Microsoft would close the deal unless Yahoo found another suitor. Rupert Murdoch's News Corp., which last year proposed swapping its MySpace social-networking site for a 25% stake in Yahoo, is likely to remain on the sidelines of the costly bidding, a person who spoke with executives there said.

Analysts said Yahoo's only alternative might be to try outsourcing its search-advertising business to Google, essentially turning to its prime competitor to fend off Microsoft.

Investors expecting the half-cash, half-stock deal to be completed bid Yahoo stock up $9.20 to $28.38, while Microsoft slipped $2.15 to $30.45. Executives said Microsoft's earnings would be depressed by such an acquisition until the second full fiscal year after it closed.

"The result will be an incredibly efficient and competitive offering for consumers, for advertisers and for publishers", Ballmer said on a conference call with analysts.

Google shares fell $48.40 to $515.90, a day after its fourth-quarter profit and revenue fell short of analysts' expectations. The company declined to comment on the proposed merger.

Yahoo had declined to enter into acquisition talks as recently as February of last year, saying it had a strategy to turn things around, according to the offer letter Microsoft made public Friday. "A year has gone by, and the competitive situation has not improved", Ballmer wrote to Yahoo's board.

After taking over in June, Yang said he would take 100 days to review the state of the company. Seven months later, shareholders said they had not seen any substantial changes.

"Investors lost faith in the company", said analyst Anthony Valencia of TCW Group in Los Angeles. "They waited and waited".

More than seven times larger than its $6-billion acquisition of Web advertising specialist AQuantive, Microsoft's Yahoo bid is tantamount to a dramatic admission that the company needs help making a run at Google as the world uses the Web for more daily tasks.

"The old Microsoft strategy of pouring money in until it works wasn't going to do it", analyst Charles DiBona of Sanford C. Bernstein said. "You have to give them some credit for changing gears".

Microsoft executives said that combining research and development efforts could produce better ad targeting based on consumer behavior. And Hollywood studios would be more willing to cut deals with a company that reaches a broader audience.

Ballmer acknowledged the power of the Yahoo brand, which has earned consumer trust while Microsoft labels such as ‘Windows Live Search’ have left people scratching their heads.

"Microsoft can't try to brand it all Microsoft", Citigroup analyst Brent Thill said.

Thousands of employees, at each company, labor on competing products in areas such as e-mail, search, portals, ad services, news and maps. Microsoft said it would save $1 billion a year by joining forces. Staffers said they expected job cuts at both firms.

Yahoo has had a series of focused partnerships with Microsoft -- at times delivering ads and providing search technology for the MSN portal. Nevertheless, opposition to all things Microsoft has motivated the troops there.

"There's certainly anti-Microsoft sentiment", one Yahoo employee said on condition of anonymity. "People would be happy to have a counteroffer".

Hostile takeovers are rare in the software industry because the workforce is often the most-prized asset. Microsoft executives said they would offer incentive packages to retain top talent.

Although the marriage won't be easy, Microsoft earns so much money from its software businesses that it could recover even from a bungled integration of Yahoo's Web properties, Pacific Crest Securities analyst Brendan Barnicle said. "They can get a lot of this stuff wrong and you'll never know", he said.

joseph.menn@latimes.com

jessica.guynn@latimes.com

Times staff writer Alana Semuels contributed to this report.

    photo
Bill Gates is chairman of Microsoft, which hopes to acquire Yahoo in an effort to challenge online search giant Google.
(Andrew Gombert / EPA)


   
photo
Microsoft Chief Executive Steve Ballmer indicated in a letter to Yahoo's board of directors that the world’s largest software maker is determined to bring the two companies together.
(AFP / Getty Images)

THE GATES METHOD: To develop a muscular Search Engine, Gates relies on Steroids, not weight training! Succeed by Failing!



     
photo
Jerry Yang, the co-founder of Yahoo and its current chief executive, is also one of the company's largest shareholders.
(John G. Mablanglo / EPA)


THE YANG METHOD: To develop a muscular bank account, Yang relies on Patient Mediocrity! All things come to him, who waits patiently by standing still! God bless Bill Gates!

I wanted to publish the photo of Google’s CEO, but he was in the ‘John’ after shitting in his pants. Fail by Succeeding! So you think Capitalism is the Ultimate Economic System, huh! If you see nothing wrong with this situation and it’s dearth of actual business growth instead of companies’ manipulation, then perhaps the problem lies with you!

How could Internet Users possibly benefit from fewer Big Search Engines! Competition by as many Big Players as possible benefits the Public. Restraint, consolidation, mergers and acquisitions benefit Investors, stockholders and CEOs.

Tabacco warns you this is not the sort of rhetoric you are likely to hear from Economists, Capitalists, Investors and dilettantes. Perhaps that’s why you read “Tabacco” – to get a fresh perspective and perhaps a more realistic and truthful viewpoint.


When everybody is in virtual agreement, that’s the time to do a thorough reevaluation! And worst of all, except for bloggers with a viewpoint, alternate points of view almost never even get heard or read in America. And you think that’s “Democracy”!


Tabacco: I consider myself both a funnel and a filter. I funnel information, not readily available on the Mass Media, which is ignored and/or suppressed. I filter out the irrelevancies and trivialities to save both the time and effort of my Readers and bring consternation to the enemies of Truth & Fairness! When you read Tabacco, if you don’t learn something NEW, I’ve wasted your time.


In 1981's 'Body Heat', Kathleen Turner said, "Knowledge is power".

 
logo

T.A.B.A.C.C.O.  (Truth About Business And Congressional Crimes Organization) – Think Tank For Other 95% Of World

tags:                                              




1. Tabacco left...
Monday, 4 February 2008 9:43 am :: http://tabacco.blog-city.com/

Google: Microsoft Deal Bad for Internet SAN FRANCISCO, Sun Feb 03, 09:24 PM A Yahoo worker walks into Yahoo headquarters in Sunnyvale, Calif. in this Jan. 29, 2008 file photo. Microsoft Corp. has pounced on the slumping Internet icon with an unsolicited takeover offer of $44.6 billion in its boldest bid yet to challenge Google Inc.'s dominance of the lucrative online search and advertising markets.

Google Inc. raised the specter of Microsoft Corp. using its proposed $42 billion acquisition of Yahoo Inc. to gain illegal control over the Internet, underscoring the online search leader's queasiness about its two biggest rivals teaming up.

The critical remarks, posted online Sunday by Google's top lawyer, represented the Mountain View-based company's first public reaction to Microsoft's unsolicited bid for Yahoo since the offer was announced Friday.

"Microsoft's hostile bid for Yahoo raises troubling questions", David Drummond, Google's chief legal officer, wrote. "This is about more than simply a financial transaction, one company taking over another. It's about preserving the underlying principles of the Internet: openness and innovation". http://www.optimum.net/News/AP/Article?articleId=380749

Tabacco: I agree with Google up to a point: that point is the "chutzpah" David Drummond exhibits. Google is the same company that keeps records of every search you make in a secret location. Google is the company that assists the communist Chinese government to censor the Internet in China, thus undermining the principles of "openness and innovation" they claim to cherish. Google, like all the other Internet Search Engines, wants to end "Net Neutrality". So this tirade is like the "pot calling the kettle black". Google has no problem with not preserving Internet Neutrality, Openness, Equal Access and Fairness; their objective is to preserve the No. 1 position of Google.

This bullshit would sound a lot more genuine if it came out of the mouth of some respected authority, not involved in any way with Google.

The fear is legitimate; the stated objection is bullshit!

Tabacco